{"id":1489,"date":"2013-07-12T13:59:58","date_gmt":"2013-07-12T13:59:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hr-softwareblog.com\/?p=1489"},"modified":"2013-07-12T13:59:58","modified_gmt":"2013-07-12T13:59:58","slug":"present","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.comparehris.com\/blog\/present\/","title":{"rendered":"HRIS Past, Present, and Where to go From Here?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"HR<\/a>Time clocks were the first HRIS tools. In the days when keypunch was the rule, you slipped a card into a clock that stamped it. Supervisors approved what they saw, and managers passed them up the line to payroll. It makes you wonder how they do payroll in a culture where the abacus still rules.<\/p>\n

A Matter of Trust<\/strong><\/p>\n

Moreover, it was not just a matter of accuracy and charting; it was a matter of trust. As the technology improved, the data did not depend on supervisor approval; it challenged manipulation or revision and provided data universally across the operation.<\/p>\n

HRIS programs introduced variations on, and sophisticated versions of, the time clock concept. Time cards were not necessary except as a tangible consolation to the employee, and they would disappear soon thereafter. A reporting mechanism, it sent data to payroll, usually in-house. It saved time and reduced challenges to the record. Vendors and users worked on keeping it secure.<\/p>\n

The Analog Paradigm<\/strong><\/p>\n

The developers were a long while coming out of the abacus mode. They pretty much focused on processing, speed of processing, and managing multiple layers of reporting. They were still ruled by the analog paradigm \u2013 until the 1980\u2019s.<\/p>\n

To give you some perspective, this is the time of big names in computing, like Tandy, Compaq, Timex, and IBM. Pac-Man was state-of-the-art, and the worldwide web had no legs yet. So, gathering and processing remained the norm.<\/p>\n

Once Enterprise Management Programs (ERP) realized there was trans-operational value in the data that Finance owned, the other divisions demanded a share in the info. HRIS software began as integrated systems that could collect, archive, analyze, and report information regarding the business\u2019 personnel. Still thinking of employees as FTEs, the data remained a financial issue now available to management in real time to support their decision making regarding labor overhead.<\/p>\n

HRIS Added Values<\/strong><\/p>\n

As HR professionals came to embrace the processing value of such software, the leaders among them saw the advantage of regaining some ownership in the progression by selling management on additional values in the processing:<\/p>\n